COMMUNICATION PATTERNS OF DEAF STUDENTS WITH HEARING LECTURER IN THE CLASSROOM

doi:10.36782/jcs.v12i2.2277

COMMUNICATION PATTERNS OF DEAF STUDENTS WITH HEARING LECTURER IN THE CLASSROOM

Risti Aprilia, Fitria Khairum Nisa

Abstract

Deaf people communicate differently, such as using sign language or writing. This communication style difference becomes a problem when a deaf person is in higher education, where most of the communication is verbal orally. Most deaf students in the university in Indonesia do not have a standardized facility to help them study in class; therefore, each student could have a different communication style during class lectures. This article identifies the classroom communication patterns between deaf students and hearing lecturers. The research's informants are deaf students from three universities in Central Java. The characteristics of the informant are; 1) deaf student, 2) use more than one communication medium, and 3) the communication with the teacher happened in the classroom (offline class). This study uses a qualitative approach with a phenomenological method to understand the phenomenon of deaf students in the classroom—data obtained through in-depth interviews and literature study. The results of this study indicate that deaf students have a variety of communication styles in classrooms, such as a mobile application called Live Transcribe, a note taker, and an interpreter. However, there are still many obstacles, such as the transcripts from the application that are not per the speech, note takers that do not give a piece of comprehensive information, and the limited number of interpreters. Therefore, the students must change the media communication regularly depending on the situation to overcome those problems.

To cite this article (7^th APA style):

Aprilia, R. & Nisa, F. K. (2022). Communication patterns of deaf students with hearing lecturer in the classroom. Journal Communication Spectrum: Capturing New Perspectives in Communication 12(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.36782/jcs.v12i2.2277

Keywords

Communication in classroom; Communication patterns; Deaf students; Disabilities; Hearing lecturer

References

Ariej, M. C., & Rahardjo, T. (2019). Adaptasi komunikasi mahasiswa tuli di perguruan tinggi. Interaksi Online, 8(1), 132-144. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/26340

Arnett, R. C., Fritz, J. M., & Bell, L. M. (2009). Communication ethics literacy: Dialogue and difference. SAGE Publications.

Badewi, M. H. (2015). Relasi antarmanusia dalam nilai-nilai budaya Bugis: Perspektif filsafat dialogis Martin Buber. Jurnal Filsafat, 25(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.12615

DeVito, J. A. (2011). Komunikasi antar manusia [The interpersonal communication book] (A. Maulana, Trans.) (5th ed.). Karisma Publishing Group. (Original work published 1989).

Dewi, S. (2007). Komunikasi Bisnis. Andi Offset.

Effendy, O. U. (2003). Ilmu, teori dan filsafat komunikasi. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Griffin, E. A. (2012). A first look at communication theory (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Gumelar, G., Hafiar, H., & Subekti, P. (2018). Konstruksi makna BISINDO sebagai budaya tuli bagi anggota GERKATIN. INFORMASI: Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi, 48(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v48i1.17727

Handayani, M. A. (2018). Komunikasi anak tuna rungu (Studi etnografi komunikasai pada anak-anak tuna rungu di SLB B Yakut Purwokerto). INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 3(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v3i2.213-230

Hia, R. (2014). Konsep Relasi Manusia Berdasarkan Pemikiran Martin Buber. MELINTAS, 30(3), 303. https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v30i3.1448.303-322

Iumentut, G. F., Pantow, J. T., & Waleleng, G. J. (2017). Pola komunikasi pemimpin organisasi dalam meningkatkan motivasi kerja anggota di LPM (lembaga pers mahasiswa) inovasi UNSRAT. Acta Diurna Komunikasi, 6(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/actadiurnakomunikasi/article/view/15480

Lestari, D. S. (2016). Penyesuaian sosial pada mahasiswa tuli. INKLUSI: Journal of Disability Studies, 3(1), 103-134. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.030106

Lintangsari, A. P. (2014). Identifikasi kebutuhan mahasiswa tuli dalam pembelajaran bahasa tulis. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 1(1), 60-70. https://ijds.ub.ac.id/index.php/ijds/article/view/11

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Teori komunikasi [Theories of human communication] (M. Y. Hamdan, Trans.). Salemba Humanika. (Original work published 2008).

Morissan. (2013). Teori komunikasi: Individu hingga massa. Prenada Media.

Mulyana, D. (2015). Ilmu komunikasi: Suatu pengantar (19th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rakhmat, J. (2018). Psikologi komunikasi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Rumyaru, B. (2018). “Top ten”, citra relasional manusia dalam "trias entitas” tinjauan kritis-dialogis pandangan Buber dan Heidegger. Expose: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.33021/exp.v1i1.366

Setyawan, A., Naphan, G. X., Dynata, K., Friry, J. E., & Hendric Spits Warnars, H. L. (2019). Aplikasi Deaf Helper untuk interaksi komunitas penderita gangguan pendengaran. JUST IT : Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Teknologi Informatika dan Komputer, 10(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.24853/justit.10.1.18-26

Wasito, D. R., Sarwindah, D., & Sulistiani, W. (2012). Penyesuaian Sosial Siswa tuna Rungu Di Sekolah Umum. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 2(2), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v2n2.p81-92

West, R. L., & Turner, L. H. (2017). Pengantar teori komunikasi: Analisis dan aplikasi [Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application] (H. Bhimasena, & G. T. Pratiwi, Trans.) (5th ed.). Salemba Humanika. (Original work published 2013).

Wuryanti, S. (2019, February 12). Kemampuan verbal peserta didik tunarungu usia 6-11 tahun di Indonesia. BPPB Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/10513/

Full Text: PDF EN