PENGUJIAN KECURANGAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN MENGGUNAKAN FRAUD HEXAGON MODEL
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze fraudulent financial statements using fraud hexagon theory which consists of six elements are stimulus, capability, collusion, opportunity, rationalization, and ego. These elements are measured with financial stability, ineffective monitoring, change of auditor, change of directors, Frequent Number of CEO’S Pictures, and state-owned enterprises. The existence of mixed results and the phenomena regarding fraudulent financial statements, as well as the limited research using the fraud hexagon theory specifically in Indonesia, prompted this research to be carried out by investigating the factors that influence financial statement fraud. The population of this research is the manufacture sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2016-2020. The sampling technique used a purposive sampling method. Based on these methods a sample size of 255 is obtained. The data analysis method uses logistic regression analysis. The results showed that the variables of financial stability, ineffective monitoring, change of directors, and frequent number of CEO’S pictures had no effect on fraudulent financial statements. Meanwhile, the financial stability and state-owned enterprise variable has a positive effect on fraudulent financial statements.
Keywords
References
Agusputri, H., & Sofie. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. (14(2), 105-124 ed.). Jurnal Informasi Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v14i2.5049
Akbar, T. (2017). The Determination of
Fraudulent Financial Reporting Causes by Using Pentagon Theory on Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia (14(5 (December). ed.). International Journal of Business, Economics and Law.
Aprilia. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh
Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. (8(2) ed.). Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v10i1.12571
Arens, Elder, & Beasley. (2012).
Auditing and Assurance Service an Integrated Approach (14th ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2018). Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse 2018. (Report to The Nations ed., Vol. 1-80). Report to The Nations.
Beneish, M. D. (1999). The Detection of Earnings Manipulation (55(5), 24–36 ed.). Financial Analysts Journal. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Others People
Money, A Study in Thesocial Psychology of Embezzlement (1-30 ed.). Montclair: Patterson Smith.
Crowe. (2011). Why the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough.
Eisanhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. (14(1), 57–74 ed.). The Academy of Management Review.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program Spss. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Harvianto, B. (2015). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pergantian Kantor Akuntan Publik (Auditor Switching) (2(2) ed.). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial. (3, 305–360 ed.). Journal of Financial Economics.
Kusumawardhani, P. (2013). Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Triangle pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Kusumosari, L. (2020). Analisis
Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Fraud Hexagon Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2018. Under Graduates thesis, Unnes.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by :
Alamat Redaksi Media Riset Akuntansi
Kampus Universitas Bakrie
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-22, Kuningan – Jakarta Selatan 12920 | Tlp: +6221-5261448, +6221-5263182 Fax: +6221-5263191, +6221-5276543
email: [email protected], website: http://jurnal.bakrie.ac.id/index.php/journal_MRA/index